Adam Pain, Danielle Huot, Ashley Jackson, Giulia Minoia
Combining considerations of power, politics, and development, this special issue in Asian Survey Vol. 58, No. 6 aims to examine struggles between various state and non-state development-oriented actors, the processes through which such conﬂicts are resolved, and the resulting impact on development policy and outcomes in Afghanistan. The special issue was originally conceived during a panel on power, politics, and development in Afghanistan, which took place at an International Studies Association conference in September 2016 at Oxford University.
Three articles from the special issue build on research financed by the Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium’s global research programme on livelihoods in conflict-affected situations:
Village context and the National Solidarity Program in Afghanistan – Adam Pain
This paper explores the relation between the design of Afghanistan’s National Solidarity Program and implementation outcomes. It draws on a study of village contexts to understand the variability in the relations of responsibility and accountability that exist between customary village leadership, village elites, and village households. Findings on diverse processes of “bricolage” between the NSP intervention and customary practices highlight the politics of village life, which the technical assumptions of the NSP do not address.
Challenges of late development in Afghanistan: the transformation that did not happen – Adam Pain, Danielle Huot
Agriculture has been seen as the engine of growth for Afghanistan, but it has failed to deliver. Evidence from a long-term livelihood study points to a rural economy that is driven more by social relations than by market relations. These are underpinned by major land inequality and a distributional economy concerned with survival, given the absence of rural employment.
Political and economic life in Afghanistan: networks of access – Ashley Jackson, Giulia Minoia
In Afghanistan, relationship-based networks permeate formal governance institutions, the economy, and everyday life, regulating how resources are distributed. This paper argues that since 2001, modes of external intervention in Afghanistan have failed to understand these “rules of the game.” This paper sets out a new understanding of the power relations that govern engagement in politics and the economy.
These articles, and all others in the special issue, are available from the University of California Press’ website here by pay to view. The editors of the special issue are Nematullah Bizhan, Matthew Willner-Reid and Jasmine Bhatia.